Illusions of Competence: Getting More Accurate Results From Level 1 Surveys

Many studies have shown that learners are not particularly good at estimating how well they have learned something. In a 2005 paper:

Illusions of Competence

Koriat and Bork found that: ”JOLs (Judgments of Learning) can instill a sense of competence during learning that proves unwarranted during testing.”

But other studies (Nelson and Dunlosky, 1991) have shown that JOLs are more accurate if you ask the students about their learning after a delay.

So, what does this mean for a trainer? If you are using Level 1 surveys to elicit feedback from a course you are going to get more accurate data if you do it after a delay and not immediately after course completion. The delay does not have to be long, perhaps just an hour or so – enough time to clear out working memory.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s